One more time to fill it up, one more time to kill
I saw you look like a Japanese baby
In an instant, I remembered everything
Confession: I had myself one hell of a case of squirrel-itis yesterday evening. I’m not proud of it, but I’m man enough to admit it. This is why I try not to spout off immediately after a game. For a while there, I was Message Board Guy. I had to shower twice to get the stink of crybag off of me.
The symptom? Well, after a week one division win in which the Saints put up 438 total yards, including six plays of 20+ and two of 40+, Reggie Bush put up 163 total yards, the defense gave up only 13 points, holding Fabulous Jeff to only 221 yards passing and Joey Galloway to only 56 yards receiving, while producing two sacks and an interception, all I wanted to think about was "This is bullshit, the Saints should have put up 40 and won by three scores."
I called Sean Payton scared. I accused him of pansy-ass playcalling. I was happy about the win, but I refused to allow myself to be impressed. "What in the hell has happened to the so-called high octane, light ‘em up offense? Why does Sean Payton insist on playing small ball with a batting order full of roided up sluggers? Why didn’t they hang 40 on this circus of queers?"
Then I woke up this morning and thought to myself… "Sheesh Wang, you sure can be a real asshole sometimes."
Guilty as charged.
I’m not sure what I was expecting. After all, Tampa’s defense was 3rd in the NFL last year in points allowed per game (16.9 ppg) and the Saints put up 24. Tampa’s defense was 2nd in the NFL last year in yards allowed per game (278.4 ypg) and the Saints put up 438. The Saints only put up 438+ yards last year three times, once against a middling defense (Jacksonville) and twice against terrible defenses (Atlanta and San Francisco.) Even in 2006, the Saints only put up 438+ three times. And again, only once against an average defense (Pittsburgh) and twice against terrible defenses (Cincinnati and Dallas.) And two of those were losses, with a significant portion of the offensive stats coming in desperate come-from-behind attempts.
It remains to be seen whether or not Tampa’s defense will end up proving anywhere near as good as it was last year. We’ll have to wait for the season to play out, of course. But based on the best info we have to go on right this minute (Tampa’s defensive rankings and stats from last year) it could be reasonably argued that, considering the quality of the opposing defense, yesterday’s game could very well be the single strongest offensive performance we’ve seen yet from the Payton/Brees Saints. And that’s saying a mouthful.
So what was I bitching about yesterday evening? Why was I so unimpressed? Beats the hell out of me. My best guess is that it probably has a lot to do with it not being all that aesthetically pleasing (or in other words, "fly" ) by Saints standards. They’ve looked an awful lot better than they looked yesterday. It didn’t evoke the kind of subjective, observational superlatives like "explosive" and "dominant" that we’ve applied to this offense after other games.
But it was one hell of a strong performance. Damn strong. This is why snap judgments based solely on subjective observation are so often misleading.
On the other hand, I’m not going to back off on my assertion that something has happened to Sean Payton’s balls-to-the-wall killer instinct that used to be ever-apparent in his offensive playcalling. As always, I’m fully open to the possibility that I’m full of shit and just plain wrong. Especially since I’m saying this on the heels of a game in which the Saints’ three touchdowns came on plays of 39, 42 and 84 yards.
But surely I’m not the only one who notices those times when, if you didn’t know any better, you’d swear that Sean Payton has intentionally turned the offense off for some reason. Just shut it down. As if the fog of war has blinded the Saints offense to anything beyond about 5 yards past the line of scrimmage. And you wonder why, if the Saints can score three times on plays of 39+ yards, why does it seem like the only reason they didn’t score six times on plays of 39+ yards is because they just didn’t wanna.
Still, Ralph Malbrough is right: I’m nitpicking. The offense yesterday perfomed arguably as well as it ever has against an elite defense. There might have been a couple of games in 2006 when Reggie Bush was as effective as he was yesterday, but never has he been more effective. Yesterday ranked no lower than "1c" on his list of "career games" so far. Peter Tom is making more of a believer out of me every time he touches the ball. Somehow Jack Hunt keeps making huge plays despite having nubs at the ends of his arms. The offensive line held their own against an elite defensive line.
Washington is in for a world of hurt next weekend. A world of hurt.
Meanwhile, on the other side of the ball, the opposite is true in terms of perception vs. reality.
The defense sure did look good for the most part. Better than we’ve seen in quite a while. Sedrick Ellis and Tracy Porter made their presence felt to a far greater degree than might have been expected of a couple of rookies. Especially Porter, being that he’s a rookie corner. Number 22 was straight up outstanding. Jon Vilma led the team in tackles. Charles Grant looked like a fire had been lit under his ass. The defense carried their weight the whole game and were every bit as responsible for the win as the offense was. And in the end, the Asian Assassin secured the win as every single one of us were just wondering which Bucs receiver was going to snatch the game from us in the final seconds. Again.
Great, right?
Well, far be it from me to piss all over what really was a pleasant surprise from what most of us are describing as a "new and improved" defense. But I’d like to humbly suggest that we curb our enthusiasm just a bit for now.
Sure, it was great to see the defense hold its own, to give up one lone touchdown over a whole four quarters, to hold notorious Saints killer Joey Galloway under a million yards for once, to not give up a single passing play over 26 yards, to sack Fabulous Jeff twice (with at least two or three near-misses in there too) and to keep the pressure on him pretty much all day.
But let’s not forget that Tampa’s offense was 18th in the league last year with 326.8 offensive yards per game. They put up 352 on the Saints yesterday. Last year the Saints defense gave up an average of 348 total yards per game. Uh oh.
The Saints "held" Fabulous Jeff to 221 yards passing, but Jeff’s per game average last year was only 187.7. In fact, the last time Fab Jeff average 221+ passing yards per game was 7 years ago. The Saints allowed Jeff about 30 or 40 more passing yards than he’s usually good for lately. And the Saints defense allowed only about 24 fewer passing yards than their 2007 average.
The Saints held Galloway to "only" 56 yards receiving, but we here at moosedenied have been saying all offseason that it’s quite possible that Galloway is about ready to have a fork stuck in him anyway. His receiving totals in his last three games last year were 7, 29 and 9 yards. He only posted three 100 yard games all of last year (two of those coming against the Saints, of course.) He had eight games last year with 50 yards or less.
And perhaps most disturbing of all, the Bucs ran for 146 yards yesterday at a rate of 7.3 yards per carry. The Bucs averaged 117 rushing yards per game last year, and 4.2 yards per carry. Last year, the Saints allowed an average of 102.9 rushing yards per game and 4.0 yards per carry.
As good as it looked as it was happening yesterday, considering the stats, dare I say…. guh?
Sure, they were without Mike McKenzie. Sure, you have to throw out the record books and the stat sheets to an extent when it comes to divisional matchups. Sure, Tampa always plays the Saints tough. But let’s not let that confuse us as to the who’s whos and the what’s whats. It was one hell of a strange game, and it sure didn’t look like it on first glance, but in the end, "they are who we thought they were."
The offense is elite. As always.
The defense is questionable. As always.
The Bucs are tough, but ultimately, the Saints are better.
11 Comments
Make A CommentComments RSS Feed TrackBack URL


September 8th, 2008 at 4:09 pm
Great assessment. If I had any argument at all, it would be that the difference is how the Bucs got their yards. I hate [hate hate] football cliche’s, but “bend but don’t break” certainly comes to mind.
If we can avoid 2 outcomes - turning the ball over and giving up big plays on defense - then we can afford to play the way we did yesterday on both sides of the ball and still have a good shot at winning.
I also liked the way we controlled the clock, at least from the standpoint of being at the game (I haven’t seen the official stats on that one yet), but it seemed like we did a good job of keeping their offense off the field. Whether that is a product of a watered down offense or not, I can’t say. I’m just happy we won.
September 8th, 2008 at 6:22 pm
Well, I was feeling better about the defense until I saw those comparisons.
Nope, I still feel better. Not remotely comfortable, but better. Vilma, Sed and Porter are nice upgrades that will only get better. Pretty good pressure on Garcia with few blitzes and stunts. Gotta wrap up on tackles. Graham was wearing Saints repellant yesterday.
September 8th, 2008 at 11:24 pm
I was having some panic attacks throughout the first half. What was with the sloppy penalties? What was with the special teams? Where was our offense? I felt better after the 2nd half. 1st game jitters are behind me now; I’ll be in top form next week.
September 9th, 2008 at 11:46 am
I think that Brees interception for a TD might have gotten into Payton and forced him to slow it down a bit. It certainly changed the momentum of the game for a while.
At least Jason David didn’t mess it all up.
Just to finish off those two quotes (and I know it’s not a contest but I still would like to claim my very own bag of flaming pooh)-
Whatever I do, it’s never enough.
Never Enough - The Cure
Let’s go for a walk.
The Walk - The Cure.
September 9th, 2008 at 1:16 pm
hey, it’s just the first game and a win is a win is a win- especially in your own division and I think TB won NFC South last year, so… You have some very valid points, but also consider Payton’s play calling also involved a 3rd and 3 that resulted in a 39 yeard pass for a td- that’s not scared or conservative. I do agree that Payton should have been bolder in the last 2 minutes, but it turned out to be a win-win situation… it’s better that the defense won this game at the end, They needed the confidence boost. Off wil be fine. And.. the best part is we should eventually get back Deuce, McKenzie, Stecker, Meachum, Usama, and Hollis. No other team in the NFL had such high quality players in reserve resting up for future weeks to make an impact
September 9th, 2008 at 1:23 pm
also, i am sure them having Jeff Faine was something we had to overcome- he could help them alomng with our playbook and with Payton’s play calling tendencies as well as our defensive schemes. all in all a great showing with some signifcant room for improvement which should happen steadily. in the NFL I think the whole key is find a way to win- whether it is pretty or ugly- just win and evrything will build and fall into place. there is no team in the NFL that the Saints can’t beat on any given Sunday, but they have to be content to win even if it’s ugly.
September 9th, 2008 at 1:30 pm
Good stuff all around guys. Hey Philinwood, thanks for stopping by and especially for leaving a comment, which always makes my day.
I hear ya. I know I’m being contrarian here, even though the defense LOOKED a hell of a lot better to me too. I was very happy with the game overall, in fact.
There’s a reason they call it “midseason form.” The Saints aren’t there yet, but then again, it’s not midseason either. 1-0 after a home divisional win is more than enough. I get it, and I’m right there.
But hey, I try to give you stuff you’re not gonna find elsewhere, you know? You think Pete Finney is gonna try to point out that the offense was better than they looked and the defense might not have been as good as they looked after this game? No way in hell. That would require putting a little thought into it.
LatinTeacher…
When possible, I try to find some sort of tangential relevance when selecting a Today’s Tuneski. The more tangential and hard to decipher, the better. Never Enough is me poking fun at myself for bitching after such a nice win. And of course the Japanese baby reference is for Scotty Badass.
September 9th, 2008 at 3:12 pm
You’re nitpicking, but I had the same feeling.
I felt like we were the better team, but (1) we kept killing ourselves with stupid penalties in the first quarter, and (2) when the schizo game switched from a fifties’ style defensive struggle into an ABA game with two minutes left to go in the third, nobody was able to step up on defense and make a big play, and an INT on fourth down always seems anticlimactic for some reason. Just spike the effin’ ball down.
If there’s any consolation, our defense got better as the year went on in 2006.
September 10th, 2008 at 7:32 am
i think this has been a great discussion. in my previous post, i also left out Bryant Young and Mark Simoneau as players on the sidelines that will contribute in the long season as time goes by. i think the Saints have a great team this year. certainly i have seen better teams in other years come out of places like chicago or miami, new england dallas, etc i am not sayng they are the best ever by any means. but what i like about them is a few things 1) their depth- i love when i see people like meachem and mc kenzie and hollis thomas and usama young and deuce who are not getting beat up
right now but you know will be there to contribute as the season wears on 2) the spirit and the attitude of the team seems pretty ideal from what i can glean 3) possibly the best offense in football (certainly the potential to be) and a defense that is striving and committed to be on a par with the offense- good stuff!!!
September 10th, 2008 at 7:38 am
i just wanted to add one m ore point. my perspective is different than a lot of Saints fans. i live in Eagles territory and i hate the Eagles. What i see up here i hope NO can avoid. the bfans and media over react to so many things. if mc nabb has a bad quarter, if andy reid calls a bad game, there is the tumultous knee-jerk reaction and paranoia, panic and chaos result. it seems the team must read the blogs and watch the news, commentaries, etc and they get caught into it and what was a bad half of football instantaneously spawns a movement to change coaches, quarterbacks, linebackers, etc and to make trades and change philosophy and game plans, etc. i know this has a tendency to happen evrywhere to some degree, but it’s incredibly extreme in eagles territory and i think it handicaps the team and is one reason they just can never get over the hump
September 12th, 2008 at 10:24 am
[...] gonna get from Reggie Bush on a given week, and these days, the same applies to Dulymus. And some of us aren’t quite ready to buy into the hype just yet re: the "new and improved" defense. (And for the record, I’m not making [...]